Macquarie Telecom allegedly copied product from a Melbourne tech company

105
Macquarie Telecom logo | iTMunch

Australian tech firm Cocoon Data has filed a statement in the Supreme Court of New South Wales claiming that Macquarie Telecom allegedly copied one of its products. It further claimed that Macquarie Telecom misled government customers by providing wrong information about product upgrades which could have potentially made agencies more prone and vulnerable to online attacks. Macquarie Telecom has denied the claims filed by Cocoon Data.

Cocoon Data’s claim against Macquarie Telecom

The product Macquarie Telecom allegedly copied from Cocoon Data is Safe Share, a software that enables users to share files through a cloud-based encrypted platform. Cocoon Data filed the claim on September 22nd 2020 and Macquarie Telecom has 28 days from the date of filing to respond to the same. Failing to file a defence within the time provided, court will announce a judgement without a further notice.

Macquarie and Cocoon entered a contract in 2015 that allowed the first to sell Safe Share, under the name SigBox, to government agencies. At that time, Cocoon Data was known as Covata and the agreement signed didn’t prevent Cocoon from selling the product to clients that were not in the portfolio of Macquarie. 

The deal signed by the two parties included the following conditions: 

  1. Macquarie Telecom was not allowed to copy any part of the product, Safe Share Technology
  2. It could not modify, adapt or tamper with the Safe Share Technology in any way
  3. Macquarie cannot alter, remove or hide any trademark, copyright or other notice on or forming part of the product
  4. It cannot create any sort of derivative works from or translate the the product

The publically available statement filed by Cocoon says Macquarie Telecom violated the resell terms of the deal of Safe Share and created a duplicate version of the product which it said was an incremental upgrade.

Trent Telford, Cocoon Data Chief Executive said there are several reasons they’ve decided to pursue this action. The claims filed in the NSW Supreme Court articulate clearly the allegations made against Macquarie in detail, however, he adds, on a primary level, Cocoon believes Macquarie failed to encourage its customers to upgrade to the latest versions of Cocoon’s product. Telford further adds that Macquarie took a strategic decision to swap out Cocoon’s product for something Macquarie created and passed it on as merely a Sigbox Version 2.

SEE ALSO: Macquarie Group prepares its IT company Nuix for $1.5 billion IPO

Macquarie’s response to the claims

A spokesperson from Macquarie Telecom says the company denied the alleged claims made by Cocoon Data Pvt. Ltd., a former vendor. The assertions and claims are without merit and they will file a defence in the proceedings shortly, said the spokesperson. 

Macquarie Telecom has not built a competing product, instead, it is reselling an “alternative product from another vendor” which relates to a minor file storage product. 

In contrast to the alleged claim, Managing Director of Macquarie Telecom Aidan Tudehope didn’t meet the sole Director and the sole shareholder of Cocoon Data Trent Telford in 2019. As it is a matter that’s now before the courts, the spokesperson concluded by saying they would be making no further comment at this point of time.

SEE ALSO: Macquarie Telecom Group announces a new data centre in Canberra

For the latest tech news and updates, keep reading iTMunch